Neither is it a one liner about what you are doing. In a year or so of focused research, you should be ready for a real thesis defense. See how easy it is, once you know how? Process X is a better way to do task Y than any previously known methodThe same kind of defense applies here as in the previous case, but now serious comparisons with previous systems are required. Process X is a feasible way to do task YOne defense for this kind of claim is an analysis of the complexity, or completeness, or whatever, of the theoretical algorithm. The second mistake many students make is not knowing what their thesis is. What happens if the thesis fails?
Start by exploring some task domain. If you're bright, educated, and have worked hard on a topic for more than a year, you must have learned something no one else knew before. Negate it and defend that! Task Y requires process XThis is usually defended by a logical argument. People adapt memories of old games to play new games A good defense here means more than one example, and answers to questions such as the following. What's involved in extending it? It requires serious experimental evidence to defend, unless your real thesis is of the previous form, i. e., only process X is possible. Now, stop and think about what you've done and what you've learned. This is where the hard part comes, psychologically, because to create a defense for your thesis, you're going to have to attack it harder than anyone else. What are the capabilities and limits of your experiment? Is not a thesis Test it out on your advisor and other faculty members. Is it a claim that people don't find perfectly obvious, or if they do find it obvious, can you convince them that it could easily be false. Once you've refined your claim into a good thesis, now you can determine what kind of defense is appropriate for it and what more you need to do. The third mistake is not knowing how to defend it. Or what ever else might make one theory different from another. Pick one. Playing chess requires a database of actual games In computer science, the more common defense is based on empirical results from running an experiment. Understanding natural language requires context Is. If you think you have a lot of theses, you probably just have a bunch of undefended claims. [Webster's 7th New Collegiate Dictionary]. (The first mistake is describe later. )Your thesis is not your dissertation. Is not a thesis (except maybe in a linguistics department) A thesis should be new and interesting, but it doesn't have to change the foundations of all we believe and hold dear. Don't try to come up with a thesis first, and then investigate it. People use process X to do task YMany students make the mistake of picking this kind of thesis to defend. Is, as is context is not required for visual understanding. A defense presents evidence for a thesis.
Can you prove they couldn't do your examples? The defense would be an analysis of the limits of process X, i. e., things it can't do, or things it does wrong, along with evidence that those things matter. Defending a real thesis is hard. Test it out on other students. With memory organization X It must say something new. Selected excerpts from protocols and surveys of your officemates are not psychological evidence, no matter how much they might have inspired your work. Thesis: Similarly, I wrote a program to play chess Is it a claim that anyone cares about? A thesis and a defense. Can your result do the same examples the previous results did, or can you make them do yours? If your example is a piece of a larger system, how realistic are your assumptions about input and output? Thesis: Process X is a feasible mechanism for adding context sensitivity to natural language understanders It is usually very tough to do, even if the argument doesn't have to be formalized. Thesis: Process X is a terrible way to do Y, or people don't use process XThis is a reasonable thesis if process X is a serious contender. A thesis has to claim something. There are many kinds of theses, especially in computer science, but most of them can be lumped into one of the following classes: Feel free to substitute process X Take some initial ideas and push them hard for a year or so. What kind of evidence is apprpropriate depends on what kind of thesis is being defended. Thesis: If it's easy to extend, why haven't you? Among your accomplishments and experience, there will be several good candidate theses. Is it a claim that you can describe clearly and briefly? Your thesis is a position or proposition that a person (as a candidate for scholastic honors) advances and offers to maintain by argument. A thesis defense has two parts: How often do the things that your experiment does come up in the real world? Make sure you clearly specify the class of tasks Y to which your thesis applies. Besides being a proposition, a thesis has to have another property: I looked at how people play chess The first mistake that students make is to think that a thesis has to be grander than the theory of relativity. If you claim to be more efficient, what are you measuring? Thesis: Defend my thesis.